I’m satisfied with what I got done in the time frame overall
but there is a lot of work that needed to be done. The first piece I was able
to get the type to react how I intended. Although I wish the background clarity
could be a bit cleaner and clearer. The sound was okay but was missing a filler
tone to smooth out those silent moments. For the second piece I was able to get
the background how I wanted but not the type. I wanted to integrate the type
more in the background to make it feel more organic.
My thought process behind the sound may sound random but it
is not. I looked for sounds that replicated the motion of the background but
contrasted it visually. A method Stein used to create the stanzas in her work.
Taking similar sounding words with contrasting meanings and putting them
together. I think I was able to visually show Steins work with out being as literal.
The Materials I used to create the sound was a lighter dropping. A zipper being zipped. Water drops hitting a puddle of water. The first video I used the footage from the water drops to create the background. For the second piece the imagery is sawdust bouncing on a plate.
The Materials I used to create the sound was a lighter dropping. A zipper being zipped. Water drops hitting a puddle of water. The first video I used the footage from the water drops to create the background. For the second piece the imagery is sawdust bouncing on a plate.
Edit your response to remove fragments and typos. You have strong reflection content and taking a second to edit your writing strengthens your communication. (always a connection between form and content)
ReplyDelete